1773::The Enlightenment Dies in Red Square

The new year is the perfect time to build healthy habits that actually stick. AG1 helps you stay one scoop ahead of the new year by supporting energy, gut health, and filling common nutrient gaps, all with a simple daily routine.

Instead of chasing resolutions that are hard to maintain, AG1 makes health easier. Just one scoop each morning supports digestive regularity, immune defense, and energy levels, making it one of the most effortless habits to keep all year long. A fresh year brings fresh momentum, and small daily habits can make a meaningful difference.

Start your mornings with AG1, the daily health drink with 75+ ingredients, including 5 probiotic strains, designed to replace a multivitamin, probiotics, and more, all in one scoop.

For a limited time only, get a FREE AG1 duffel bag and FREE AG1 Welcome Kit with your first AG1 subscription! Only while supplies last. Get started today.

Start One Simple Habit

She was born with nothing—just a minor German princess from an impoverished duchy so obscure that history barely remembers its name. Yet Sophie Friederike Auguste von Anhalt-Zerbst would become one of the most powerful rulers in European history, transforming herself into Catherine the Great, Empress of all the Russias. Her rise reads like a fairy tale written in ambition and iron will. But what most people don't know is the precise moment when her enlightened dreams collided with reality—and how that collision would shape Russia's fate for nearly a century.

Born on May 2, 1729, in the bleak Prussian city of Stettin, young Sophie had little to recommend her. ¹ Her father, Prince Christian August of Anhalt-Zerbst, was a minor military officer governing a backwater garrison. Her mother, ambitious and cold, largely ignored her daughter in favor of Sophie's brothers. The family had a noble title but empty pockets. In the cutthroat marriage market of 18th-century European royalty, Sophie was merchandise of questionable value.

But Sophie possessed something more valuable than a dowry: ruthless determination. Raised by a French governess who taught her to think strategically, Sophie understood from childhood that her only path to significance was through marriage. She studied languages obsessively—German, French, and eventually Russian. She learned to read people, to charm, to calculate. When she met her second cousin, the future Peter III, at age ten, she found him detestable. He was pale, sickly, obsessed with toy soldiers. Yet when the opportunity came to marry him at fifteen, she seized it without hesitation.

In 1744, Sophie arrived in Russia knowing this was her one chance. She threw herself into becoming Russian with theatrical intensity. She stayed up late into freezing nights, repeating Russian phrases until she collapsed from pneumonia.² When she recovered, she converted to Russian Orthodoxy, taking the name Catherine. She wrote later that she decided then to "do whatever was necessary and to profess to believe whatever was required" to wear the crown. The marriage to Peter took place on August 21, 1745. She was sixteen. He was seventeen. It was a disaster from the wedding night.

To understand the catastrophe that was about to unfold, one must first grasp what Catherine had married into. Peter III's grandfather, Peter the Great (1672-1725), had spent decades brutally modernizing Russia, transforming it from an isolated, technologically backward realm into one of Europe's emerging powers.³ He built a new capital, St. Petersburg, on a swamp at the cost of thousands of lives. He forced nobles to shave their beards and wear Western clothing. He modernized the army and navy, created a new administrative system, and dragged Russia—kicking and screaming—into the European arena.

By the mid-18th century, Russia had emerged as a significant force, though still viewed with suspicion by more established empires. France, Britain, and Austria dominated the diplomatic scene. The Habsburg and Ottoman Empires controlled vast territories. Prussia, under Frederick the Great, was the rising military power that everyone feared. Russia was large and growing larger, but still rough around the edges—wealthy in resources but poor in infrastructure, powerful in arms but culturally insecure.⁴

This insecurity shaped everything. Russian nobles spoke French at court, read French philosophy, wore French fashions. They admired Western Europe while ruling over millions of illiterate serfs. Russia had recently been locked in a brutal conflict with Prussia during the Seven Years' War (1756-1763). Russian forces had even briefly occupied Berlin in 1760, and by late 1761, Prussia's Frederick the Great was on the verge of defeat.⁵

Then Empress Elizabeth died in January 1762, and everything changed.

Peter III was perhaps the worst possible person to rule Russia. Born Karl Peter Ulrich of Holstein-Gottorp, he was the grandson of Peter the Great—but he despised everything Russian. Raised by brutal tutors in Germany after his mother died weeks after his birth, Peter grew into a perpetually adolescent nightmare. Catherine described him as grotesque, scarred by smallpox, with a fondness for alcohol and a streak of casual cruelty⁶. He played with toy soldiers well into adulthood and delighted in practical jokes that involved someone getting hurt.

Most damaging of all: Peter worshipped Prussia, Russia's sworn enemy.⁷ He kept a private guard of German soldiers rather than Russian ones. When his aunt, Empress Elizabeth, died in December 1761, Peter ascended the throne—and immediately proved he had learned nothing about politics or survival. He wore Prussian military uniforms to Russian state functions. He withdrew Russian troops from the Seven Years' War just as Russia was winning, making peace with Frederick the Great, his Prussian idol, and abandoning Russia's Austrian allies while nullifying years of military gains. He returned conquered Prussian territories for nothing in exchange.⁸ He planned to wage war on Denmark to reclaim his ancestral Holstein lands. He insulted the Orthodox Church.

During Empress Elizabeth's funeral, Peter behaved so disgracefully that foreign diplomats commented on his instability.⁹ He would stop walking behind the funeral chariot, then run to catch up, the plume on his hat flapping in the wind. It was both pathetic and politically suicidal.

But most fatally, he humiliated his wife publicly and repeatedly. At a state dinner, Peter flew into a rage when Catherine didn't stand for a toast to the emperor. She explained that as a member of the royal family, it wasn't appropriate. Peter called her a name no one dared repeat and ordered her arrest. That was his last significant act as emperor.

On the night of June 28, 1762, Catherine's lover, Grigory Orlov, and his four brothers executed a coup so swift it seemed choreographed.¹⁰ Orlov's brother Alexei galloped to Catherine's summer residence at dawn, finding her still in bed. "The time has come for you to reign, madame," he announced. Within hours, the Imperial Guard regiments proclaimed her empress. Peter, discovering his palace abandoned, reportedly said, "Didn't I tell you she was capable of anything?" then proceeded to weep and drink. He signed his abdication like a child being sent to bed.

Peter III had ruled for exactly six months.

Eight days later, Peter was dead at Ropsha estate, under murky circumstances. The official cause: hemorrhoids and apoplexy. The reality: almost certainly murder, likely at Alexei Orlov's hands, possibly with Catherine's knowledge.¹¹ Catherine was now the sole ruler of the Russian Empire—a German woman with no legitimate claim to the throne, who had overthrown and likely murdered her husband. She would rule for thirty-four years, longer than any other woman in Russian history.

Catherine fancied herself a philosopher-queen. She corresponded with Voltaire and Diderot, the titans of the French Enlightenment. She collected their libraries when they died. She wrote a liberal "Instruction" to guide her legislative commission, filled with progressive ideas about law and justice drawn from Montesquieu and Beccaria.¹² She founded schools, libraries, and academies. She wanted Russia to be seen as civilized, enlightened, modern—not the barbaric frontier that Western Europeans imagined.

And crucially, in those early years of her reign, Catherine contemplated doing something radical: abolishing serfdom. Russia's serfs—essentially slaves bound to the land and their owners—numbered in the millions. They could be sold, beaten, worked to death. It was a system of grinding horror. Catherine, influenced by Enlightenment philosophy, wondered if Russia might evolve beyond it.¹³

Then came Yemelyan Pugachev.

Born around 1742 in a Don Cossack village, Yemelyan Pugachev was nobody special—the youngest of four children in a landowning family.¹⁴

The Cossacks themselves were a unique phenomenon in Russian history: semi-nomadic warrior communities who lived along Russia's southern and eastern frontiers—particularly along the Don, Dnieper, and Ural rivers. Originally runaway serfs, religious dissenters, and adventurers who had fled to the borderlands, the Cossacks developed their own fierce culture of independence. They elected their own leaders, governed themselves, and served the Russian crown as frontier troops in exchange for autonomy and freedom from serfdom. They were skilled horsemen, raiders, and soldiers—Russia's shock troops and border guards.¹⁵

By the 18th century, however, the Russian state was steadily encroaching on Cossack freedoms, imposing greater control, taxation, and military conscription. The proud, independent Cossacks were being absorbed into the empire's bureaucratic machinery. Resentment simmered.

Pugachev himself was illiterate but capable. He joined the military at seventeen and fought in the Seven Years' War and later in the Russo-Turkish War. He achieved the rank of khorunzhiy, a Cossack company commander, through battlefield skill.¹⁶ But in 1770, claiming severe illness, he requested permanent discharge. The military refused. So Pugachev deserted.

For the next three years, he lived as a fugitive, wandering among the Old Believers—religious dissenters who rejected Orthodox reforms. He was arrested multiple times and escaped multiple times. During these wanderings, Pugachev witnessed something that would change his life: the profound, seething rage of Russia's lower classes. The Cossacks were losing their ancient freedoms. Serfs were being crushed under impossible taxation. Factory workers in the Urals labored in conditions approaching hell. And everywhere, people whispered a dangerous hope: that the rightful tsar, Peter III, had not really died but would return to save them.

In late 1772, Pugachev arrived among the Yaik Cossacks near the Ural River. These Cossacks had recently revolted after murdering a government official, and they remained on edge, desperate. Pugachev, showing them scars on his chest from an old illness, claimed they were "czar marks"—stigmata identifying him as God's anointed. He was, he declared, the murdered Peter III, hidden by divine providence, now returned to liberate his people.¹⁷

The audacity of it was breathtaking. But it worked.

On September 17, 1773, Yemelyan Pugachev issued his first manifesto as "Emperor Peter III." He promised the Cossacks everything: abolition of serfdom, freedom from taxation and military conscription, ownership of land, rivers, and forests, and—most seductively—revenge against the nobles who had oppressed them. ¹⁸ Within weeks, his army numbered in the thousands. Within months, tens of thousands.

This wasn't just a Cossack rebellion. Pugachev's promise to end serfdom attracted desperate serfs by the thousands. Factory workers from the Ural mines joined him. Bashkirs and Tatars, marginalized ethnic groups, swelled his ranks. He captured Orenburg, a major regional center, and laid siege to it for six months. His forces overran the vast region between the Volga River and the Ural Mountains. In Catherine's court, nobles began to panic.¹⁹

In July 1774, Pugachev achieved his greatest victory: he captured Kazan, one of Russia's most important cities, and burned it to the ground.²⁰ For a terrifying moment, it seemed possible that this illiterate Cossack claiming to be a dead emperor might actually overthrow Catherine the Great.

Catherine, who had once toasted to Enlightenment ideals in French salons, now unleashed General Alexander Suvorov, one of Russia's most brutal commanders, to crush the rebellion without mercy. In September 1774, Suvorov defeated Pugachev at Tsaritsyn. The pretender fled, but his own Cossacks, realizing the cause was lost, betrayed him and handed him over to imperial authorities.²¹

Pugachev was transported to Moscow in an iron cage. On January 21, 1775, he was executed in Red Square—beheaded and quartered before a massive crowd.²² [22] Catherine wanted to make an example of him. She had his house burned down and his family exiled. She even tried to erase the Yaik River from maps, renaming it the Ural River, hoping to obliterate the memory of where the rebellion began.

But Pugachev had already achieved something far more lasting than military victory: he had terrified Catherine to her core.

The rebellion's ferocity revealed what might happen if Catherine pursued the liberal reforms she had contemplated. Instead of abolishing serfdom, she spent the rest of her reign strengthening the nobility's control over serfs. She granted nobles near-absolute power over their "property." She expanded serfdom into newly conquered territories like Ukraine. The "Instructions" she had once written, full of Enlightenment philosophy, were quietly shelved. Between 1775 and 1785, she massively increased the bureaucracy of provincial government—not to help people, but to keep them under tight control.

We cannot know for certain what Catherine would have done without Pugachev's rebellion. Perhaps she would have abandoned reform anyway. Perhaps political realities would have made emancipation impossible regardless. But the timing is striking: before 1773, Catherine spoke of progressive change; after 1775, she became one of serfdom's greatest enforcers. Whether Pugachev caused this transformation or merely accelerated it, his rebellion marks the moment when Catherine's enlightened pretensions met their definitive end.

Serfdom—which might have ended in the 1770s under an idealistic Catherine—instead lasted another 86 years, until 1861. Millions more Russians would live and die in slavery during those decades.

History remembers Catherine the Great as an enlightened despot, a patron of the arts, an expander of empire. It largely forgets Yemelyan Pugachev.

And so, in a windowless room somewhere in the Winter Palace, Catherine filed away her dreams of a more humane Russia. She became what her husband never could: a ruthless, effective autocrat who knew when ideals had to die to preserve power. The rebellion that claimed to restore a murdered emperor instead murdered the possibility of a gentler Russia.

That is Pugachev's true legacy—not the battles he won or the cities he burned, but the transformation he forced upon the woman who would define an era. In trying to free Russia, he ensured it would remain enchained for nearly another century.

In Obscurarium, we illuminate not just what happened, but why it mattered—the obscure moments that bent the arc of history in ways we never noticed. Yemelyan Pugachev's rebellion is remembered as a failed peasant uprising. But it was the death of Catherine the Great's most dangerous dream.

What bizarre historical phenomenon should we investigate next? Drop us a line at [email protected].

Unsubscribe | View in browser | Past issues