Sponsored by
Illuminating History's Most Obscure Corners | Issue #35 | May 2026
This newsletter contains affiliate links.
In the autumn of 1945, American officials sat across a table from the men who had run Unit 731.
They already knew what the program had done. Live vivisection. Prisoners infected with plague and then cut open — without anesthetic — so researchers could observe the organs in real time. Frostbite experiments in which limbs were frozen and thawed repeatedly until the tissue died. Pressure chambers cranked until the eyes burst from their sockets.
Thousands dead.
The Americans knew all of it. They wrote Shirō Ishii a check he could cash: full immunity, no trial, no record, in exchange for the data. Ishii went home. He died in 1959, in his bed, at 67.
His victims don't have obituaries.
This is not a Unit 731 story, though it could be. It's a story about a logic that is much older and far more durable than one Japanese general or one American deal. It's about what civilization has always been willing to do — and willing to accept — when the people doing the suffering had already been designated as the kind whose pain didn't require an answer.
Bad news is good business. Not everyone buys it.
Every morning, financial news follows the same script. Headlines panic, coverage catastrophises, and somewhere inside the noise is the story that actually matters — the one that tells you where the opportunity sits, not just where the fear is pointing.
Most sources have stopped looking. The alarm is easier to sell.
The Daily Upside was created by Wall Street insiders for readers who crave real insight over recycled anxiety. Five minutes of global business and finance, before the noise sets the agenda — just the facts, context, and analysis your decisions need.
Join 1M readers — including managing directors and principals at some of Wall Street’s largest institutions — who trust The Daily Upside to filter through the chaos.
The upsides are always there. We’ll find them before breakfast.
By the time Andreas Vesalius was mapping the human body in the 1540s — producing anatomical drawings so precise they wouldn't be surpassed for centuries — the legal framework that made his work possible had been in place for hundreds of years.
Medieval European jurisprudence was unambiguous on the point: a person condemned to death forfeited their body to the state along with their life. The executed criminal had no rights that extended beyond the sentence. The gallows and the dissection table were legally continuous.
Vesalius didn't invent body snatching or corpse trading. He worked inside a system that had already decided which bodies were available and why.
What that system was really establishing — long before Vesalius, long before the early anatomists — was a logic. Certain people, by virtue of their status, their crime, their race, their captivity, could be used.
Not just punished. Used.
The distinction matters, because that logic didn't stay in the execution yard. It traveled.
Anarcha was seventeen years old. She was enslaved, owned by a plantation farmer in Alabama, and she had survived a brutal labor that left her with vesicovaginal fistula — a tear between the bladder and vagina that caused constant leaking, chronic infection, and a kind of social death.
J. Marion Sims began operating on her in 1845. He would operate on her thirty times over four years. Without anesthesia.
And this is not a detail that can be excused by the era. On October 16, 1846, a dentist named William Morton administered ether at Massachusetts General Hospital and changed medicine overnight. The patient felt nothing. The news reached Europe within weeks. Every practicing surgeon in the Western world knew what ether was within months of that demonstration.
Sims continued operating on Anarcha without it for years afterward.
His explanation, published without shame in the medical literature: Black people did not experience pain the way white people did. This was not a fringe position he arrived at alone. It was mainstream medical consensus, endorsed by institutions, taught in schools. An entire profession had agreed, in writing, that certain bodies hurt differently — which is a polite way of saying certain bodies hurt less, which is a polite way of saying certain bodies didn't fully matter.
The surgery eventually worked. Anarcha was cured of a condition that would have made the rest of her life a diminished, painful thing. That relief was real, and it would be dishonest to dismiss it.
It is also exactly what allowed Sims, and the institutions that celebrated him, to treat the question of consent as a minor detail.
She's better now. He saved her.
The other women he used — Betsey, Lucy, and others whose names weren't recorded because recording them didn't seem necessary — may not have been so fortunate. Sims went on to become the father of modern gynecology. His statue stood in Central Park until 2018, which tells you something about how long it takes a civilization to look directly at what it built and who paid for it.
Anarcha got a statue in Montgomery in 2021 — one hundred and seventy-five years after the last time Sims cut into her without asking.
The best HR advice comes from those in the trenches. That’s what this is: real-world HR insights delivered in a newsletter from Hebba Youssef, a Chief People Officer who’s been there. Practical, real strategies with a dash of humor. Because HR shouldn’t be thankless—and you shouldn’t be alone in it.
Josef Mengele kept meticulous notes. That is what everyone who has studied him remarks on first — the care, the precision, the scientific conscientiousness.
He arrived at Auschwitz in 1943 with a genuine research interest in twins, a controlled population with identical biological baselines. He was known to bring the children sweets. He injected dye into their eyes to see if he could change the color; they went blind, or died of infection, and he noted the outcomes carefully. He sutured twins together — connecting their circulatory systems, their organs — to create artificial conjoined pairs, and observed the sepsis that followed.
When he needed matched post-mortem specimens, he killed twin pairs at the same moment so the comparative data would be clean.
He escaped to Argentina in 1949. He lived there, and then in Paraguay and Brazil, for thirty years. He drowned in 1979 while swimming. His bones were identified in 1985.
He was never tried.
After the war, Allied scientists debated what to do with the Nazi hypothermia data — experiments in which prisoners were submerged in ice water until death, heart rate and core temperature logged at intervals. The results were thorough. The argument for using them was made plainly, by serious people: the victims are dead regardless. Discarding the data doesn't restore them. It only wastes what they went through.
That argument should land on you like a stone. It is also, more or less, the argument that prevailed.
Which brings us back to 1945, and the deal. The Cold War logic was clean: the Soviets were developing biological weapons, the U.S. needed the research, and Ishii had the research. The prisoners — Chinese, Korean, Russian, the records are incomplete on purpose — had already served their function. MacArthur signed the immunity order. The Truman administration knew. The scientists went home and trained students who trained students who are practicing medicine today.
At what point does inflicted suffering become data? Who decides? Who authorized the conversion — the moment a screaming person became a data point, a result, a finding that would outlive them by centuries and carry no trace of their name?
Someone did. Every single time, someone did. They had a title and a budget and a rationale and, in most cases, a long and comfortable life afterward. The knowledge they produced is still in circulation, still cited, still useful.
And the people it was taken from are still, overwhelmingly, unaccounted for.
We inherited this too. We just don't put it on the syllabus.
Further Readings:
On Vesalius and the anatomy of the condemned Ruth Richardson, Death, Dissection and the Destitute — the definitive account of how bodies moved from scaffold to dissection table across centuries. Readable and genuinely disturbing.
On J. Marion Sims and Anarcha Deirdre Cooper Owens, Medical Bondage: Race, Gender, and the Origins of American Gynecology — the scholarly book that put Anarcha, Betsey, and Lucy back into the record. Essential. Harriet Washington, Medical Apartheid — broader but devastating, traces the full arc of medical experimentation on Black Americans from slavery to the twentieth century. One of the most important books on this subject.
On Mengele and Nazi medical experimentation Robert Lifton, The Nazi Doctors: Medical Killing and the Psychology of Genocide — the landmark study. Lifton interviewed surviving doctors and asks the hardest question: how do ordinary physicians become this? Uncomfortable in exactly the right way. Gerald Posner and John Ware, Mengele: The Complete Story — more biographical, traces the escape and the thirty years of impunity in South America.
On Unit 731 and the immunity deal Sheldon Harris, Factories of Death — the most thorough English-language account of Unit 731 and the postwar cover-up. Harris documented the American role in the immunity arrangement in detail. Hal Gold, Unit 731 Testimony — survivor and witness accounts. Hard to read, impossible to look away from.
On the broader ethics of tainted knowledge Jon Michaud wrote a sharp piece in The New Yorker on the Nazi hypothermia data debate that's worth finding. The philosophical literature on this is also substantial.
What's Next in Obscurarium?
What bizarre historical phenomenon should we investigate next? Drop us a line at [email protected].